4.1 In this section we analyse the three broad locations identified in the project
brief that are shown in Figure 2.1 and develop the optimum proposal for a
bargehouse in each of the areas. We identify the merits and impacts of each
proposal and then report on the prospect of securing planning permission.
Finally we make our recommendation on whether the draft proposals should
be developed in more detail.
4.2 Having reviewed the three potential locations identified in the project brief we
then analyse the fourth option of housing Gloriana in an existing boathouse
during the winter and keeping her on a mooring in Richmond during the
4.3 The entire study area is protected by planning policies that seek to maintain
the open character of the River Thames and the adjoining public spaces. In
addition policies seek to encourage facilities for recreation and the
development of water transport. Lastly there are policies covering a wide
range of issues including design, flood risk, heritage, ecology and
landscaping that will need to be addressed in the preparation of any planning
application. We therefore first set out the town planning policy context that
will be used in determining a planning application for any proposed
bargehouse and landing stage. We then set out the other key issues that we
use to advise on the feasibility of the four options.
Town Planning Policy Context
4.4 The development plan comprises The London Plan July 2011, the retained
policies of the Richmond Unitary Development Plan (that comprise site
allocations), the LBRuT Core Strategy adopted April 2009 and the
Development Management Plan adopted November 2011.
4.5 We identify below the key policies that we have taken into consideration for
the feasibility study and reproduce the text of each policy in Appendix 2.
London Plan July 2011
4.6 The two key policies in the London Plan are Policies 17 and 7.27. Policy 17
Metropolitan Open Land says that “..the strongest protection should be given
to Metropolitan Open Land and inappropriate development refused, except in
exceptional circumstances….” Policy 7.27c Blue Ribbon Network says that
“…new infrastructure to support water dependent uses will be sought. New
mooring facilities should normally be off line from main navigation routes, i.e.
in basins or docks.”
LBRuT Core Strategy adopted April 2009
The Spatial Strategy
4.7 The Spatial Strategy reinforces Richmond’s role as an outer London Borough
with a high quality urban and historic environment and open landscape, and
as a sport and tourist destination. The Spatial Strategy is supported by the
Core Policies set out in section 8 that include the following key policies:
• CP10 Open Land and Parks
• CP11 River Thames Corridor
• CP7 Maintaining and Improving the Local Environment
• CP4 Biodiversity
Development Management Plan adopted November 2011
4.8 The DMP includes the detailed policies that will be used when new
developments are considered. The DMP takes forward the strategic
objectives in the Core Strategy and is consistent with it and with National and
Regional Policies. Key policies include:
• Policy DM OS 2 Metropolitan Open Land
• Policy DM OS 11 Thames Policy Area
• Policy DM OS 12 Riverside Uses
• Policy DM OS 13 Moorings and Floating Structures
• Policy DM HD 1 Conservation Areas
• Policy DM OS 4 Historic Parks, Gardens and Landscapes
• Policy DM SD 6 Flood Risk
Twickenham Area Action Plan Publication adopted 2nd July 2013
4.9 The brief indicates that the Option 3 location is subject to the Twickenham
Area Action Plan but the site is located outside the plan area. It adjoins the
area described as Civic and Cultural Quarter – the area focused on the Civic
Centre, York House and Gardens, the Mary Wallace Theatre, Twickenham
Museum and Library.
Policy guidance given by LBRuT planning officers
4.10 Initial comments of LBRuT planning officers on the option sites are attached
as Appendix 3.
Land Ownership, Covenants and Cost of Site
4.11 Richmond Legal Services has provided details of land ownership for each of
the sites together with covenants and leases, where relevant. We review
existing covenants and leases and assess their impact on project costs and
Loss of Public Open Space
4.12 All of the potential sites currently comprise public open space. Consultation
with Richmond planning officers has indicated that the Council would not seek
the replacement of public open space taken for the bargehouse (such as by
means of a roof terrace) but any facility should be open for public enjoyment at
Operation of the Bargehouse
4.13 Each of the sites raises different issues regarding the practicalities of moving
Gloriana, display, maintenance and generating revenue to fund the operation
of the barge. We have consulted with the operators of Gloriana together with
other specialists on detailed matters to determine the practicalities of the
various options that we evaluate.
Navigation and Marine matters
4.14 The PLA Harbour Master, Marine Engineer, Environment Team and Planning
and Partnership officers have provided comments on each of the options (see
4.15 English Heritage has provided comments particularly in relation to Option 3
Orleans Gardens and its relationship to Marble Hill House.
Loss of trees and scope for new planting
4.16 There would be a need to remove a tree or trees on each of the option sites
and we identify the extent of the tree loss.
4.17 We make an assessment of the relative visual impact of each option.
Education / Visitor Centre and Commercial Considerations
4.18 The brief refers to these additional uses and we review how they could be
provided at each of the option locations.
4.19 We identify the status of each site with regard to the London Borough of
Richmond upon Thames Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) Level 1
Update August 2010 (Final Report).
4.20 We identify the status of each of the option sites with respect to their nature
conservation interest and protected species.
Synergies with local tourism, arts and education venues
4.21 We review the opportunities that a bargehouse and visitor centre would
present in relation to other local attractions and facilities.
Prospect for securing full planning permission and other necessary consents
4.22 We indicate our views on the prospects of securing planning permission for
each option site.
4.23 Feasibility order of cost estimates have been prepared provided by Huntley
Cartwright Associates, Chartered Quantity Surveyors. These are attached as
Extracted unabridged from Feasibility study on the location of the Royal Row Barge ‘Gloriana’ (and Boat House) within the Borough. Final Report August 2013.